Decision guide · Reviewed Sep 23, 2026 · AI Meeting Assistants

Fellow
79.3
Loom
77.4Choose Fellow when you need regulated enterprises, financial firms, and security-conscious teams needing botless recording with strict data retention rules. Choose Loom when you need communicating asynchronously across time zones, capturing technical bug reports with browser logs, and sharing video walkthroughs with automatic summaries.
At a glance
The practical differences
| Decision factor | Fellow | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | regulated enterprises, financial firms, and security-conscious teams needing botless recording with strict data retention rules | communicating asynchronously across time zones, capturing technical bug reports with browser logs, and sharing video walkthroughs with automatic summaries |
| Not ideal for | individuals looking for open-ended free transcription or teams wanting bot-only public web transcription without desktop software | complex multi-track timeline video editing, high-end post-production mastering, or teams restricted from sending text transcripts to external AI processors |
| Pricing | At the review date (September 2026), Fellow offers a free tier (limited to 5 lifetime AI notes and 5 seats), a Team tier at $7/user/month billed annually ($11 monthly), Business at $15/user/month billed annually ($23 monthly), and Enterprise starting at $25/user/month billed annually (minimum 10 seats). Always verify current tiers on the official pricing page. | At the review date (September 2026), Loom offers a free Starter tier (capped at 25 videos per user and 5-minute recordings), a Business plan at $18/user/month ($15/user/month billed annually), and a Business + AI tier at $24/user/month ($20/user/month billed annually). Enterprise plans require contacting sales. Verify current pricing and packaging on Loom's official pricing page. |
| Key difference | Fellow pairs flexible capture—including device-level botless recording—with regulated governance controls like zero-day audio retention, MNPI redaction, and compliance archiving via Global Relay. | Loom couples rapid screen and webcam recording with deep Atlassian ecosystem integrations, turning walkthroughs into pre-populated Jira tickets with system logs while offering automated transcript-based editing and meeting summaries. |
| Overall rank | #50 | #149 |
| Review verdict | Fellow is well suited for organizations in regulated sectors or privacy-sensitive corporate environments that need structured meeting records without introducing unvetted recording bots into client calls. It may not fit teams seeking an entirely free ongoing tool, as its free tier is strictly capped at five lifetime AI recordings. | Loom is an effective choice for distributed teams, software engineers, and support staff aiming to replace live meetings and long emails with concise, searchable video updates. It is less suitable for productions requiring complex multi-track timeline editing or organizations that restrict third-party cloud transcription. |
Loom score factors
Fellow strengths
- No training on customer data across all plans, including free
- Botless recording operates quietly via desktop app without disrupting client calls
- Robust compliance features including zero-day retention, HIPAA eligibility, and SOC 2 Type II certification
- Integrates with over 50 tools including CRMs, project management software, and Claude
Loom strengths
- Instantly generates a shareable web link as soon as recording stops without manual rendering delays.
- Loom AI automates metadata creation, including titles, summaries, action tasks, and chapter markers.
- Captures technical diagnostics like console errors and network activity directly into Jira tickets.
- Free Starter plan includes transcription and closed captions across 50+ languages for up to 50 team members.
Frequently asked
Fellow vs Loom
Should I choose Fellow or Loom?+
Choose Fellow when you need regulated enterprises, financial firms, and security-conscious teams needing botless recording with strict data retention rules. Choose Loom when you need communicating asynchronously across time zones, capturing technical bug reports with browser logs, and sharing video walkthroughs with automatic summaries. ToolsRank scores Fellow 79.3 and Loom 77.4; the gap reflects editorial quality, utility, trust, and freshness, not popularity or payment.
Is Fellow cheaper than Loom?+
Fellow: At the review date (September 2026), Fellow offers a free tier (limited to 5 lifetime AI notes and 5 seats), a Team tier at $7/user/month billed annually ($11 monthly), Business at $15/user/month billed annually ($23 monthly), and Enterprise starting at $25/user/month billed annually (minimum 10 seats). Always verify current tiers on the official pricing page. Loom: At the review date (September 2026), Loom offers a free Starter tier (capped at 25 videos per user and 5-minute recordings), a Business plan at $18/user/month ($15/user/month billed annually), and a Business + AI tier at $24/user/month ($20/user/month billed annually). Enterprise plans require contacting sales. Verify current pricing and packaging on Loom's official pricing page. Compare the plan you would actually use and verify current prices on each vendor's pricing page before purchasing.
Which is better for ai meeting assistants?+
Fellow currently scores higher for ai meeting assistants work. Loom remains the stronger pick when your priority is communicating asynchronously across time zones, capturing technical bug reports with browser logs, and sharing video walkthroughs with automatic summaries. Avoid Fellow if you are individuals looking for open-ended free transcription or teams wanting bot-only public web transcription without desktop software.
Can I use Fellow and Loom together?+
Yes. Fellow stands out for fellow pairs flexible capture—including device-level botless recording—with regulated governance controls like zero-day audio retention, MNPI redaction, and compliance archiving via Global Relay. Loom stands out for loom couples rapid screen and webcam recording with deep Atlassian ecosystem integrations, turning walkthroughs into pre-populated Jira tickets with system logs while offering automated transcript-based editing and meeting summaries. Pairing them makes sense when one workflow needs both strengths; otherwise pick the tool that matches your primary job.