Make score factors
Editorial quality82
Practical utility86
Trust & transparency82
Freshness84
Engagement quality3
Momentum100
Decision guide · Reviewed Sep 2, 2026 · AI Automation & Workflows, AI Agent & Chatbot Builders, No-Code Automation Platforms
Make
78
n8n
81Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose n8n when you need developers and technical operations teams who want self-hostable automations with AI agents and code nodes.
At a glance
The practical differences
| Decision factor | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps | developers and technical operations teams who want self-hostable automations with AI agents and code nodes |
| Not ideal for | users who only need a few simple triggers or teams that require self-hosting | non-technical users seeking the simplest hosted automation experience |
| Pricing | A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. | The community edition is free to self-host under a fair-code licence; n8n Cloud offers Starter, Pro, and Enterprise plans priced by executions at the review date. Confirm current terms on the official pricing page. |
| Key difference | Visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. | Self-hostable automation with first-class AI agent building and code flexibility. |
| Overall rank | #68 | #23 |
| Review verdict | A favourite for people who outgrow simple triggers and want visual control. Simpler needs may be served by lighter tools, and code-first teams may prefer self-hosted options. | The best choice for technical teams that want control over hosting and want to build AI agents into workflows. Non-technical users may find hosted no-code builders easier. |
n8n score factors
Editorial quality86
Practical utility88
Trust & transparency84
Freshness90
Engagement quality5
Momentum100
Make strengths
- Powerful visual logic
- Good operation economics
- Broad integrations
- Free plan
n8n strengths
- Free self-hosting
- Strong AI agent features
- Code flexibility
- Active community
Frequently asked
Make vs n8n
Should I choose Make or n8n?+
Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose n8n when you need developers and technical operations teams who want self-hostable automations with AI agents and code nodes. ToolsRank scores Make 78 and n8n 81; the gap reflects editorial quality, utility, trust, and freshness, not popularity or payment.
Is Make cheaper than n8n?+
Make: A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. n8n: The community edition is free to self-host under a fair-code licence; n8n Cloud offers Starter, Pro, and Enterprise plans priced by executions at the review date. Confirm current terms on the official pricing page. Compare the plan you would actually use and verify current prices on each vendor's pricing page before purchasing.
Which is better for ai automation & workflows?+
n8n currently scores higher for ai automation & workflows work. Make remains the stronger pick when your priority is operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Avoid n8n if you are non-technical users seeking the simplest hosted automation experience.
Can I use Make and n8n together?+
Yes. Make stands out for visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. n8n stands out for self-hostable automation with first-class AI agent building and code flexibility. Pairing them makes sense when one workflow needs both strengths; otherwise pick the tool that matches your primary job.