Decision guide · Reviewed Sep 8, 2026 · AI Automation & Workflows, AI Document Processing & Automation

Make
78
UiPath
80.4Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose UiPath when you need enterprises requiring industrial-scale automation across desktop interfaces, back-office documents, APIs, and audited AI agents.
At a glance
The practical differences
| Decision factor | Make | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps | enterprises requiring industrial-scale automation across desktop interfaces, back-office documents, APIs, and audited AI agents |
| Not ideal for | users who only need a few simple triggers or teams that require self-hosting | freelancers or small businesses looking for quick, lightweight web app triggers without enterprise governance or complex configuration |
| Pricing | A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. | At the review date in September 2026, UiPath Automation Cloud offers a Basic plan starting at $25 per month for personal automation. Standard, Enterprise, and Test Cloud tiers require contacting sales. Features like unattended robots, BYOM, dedicated hosting, and advanced governance are tiered add-ons. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. |
| Key difference | Visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. | UiPath uniquely combines deterministic, self-healing RPA with autonomous agentic workflows and intelligent document extraction, backed by external AI certifications including AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 42001, and FedRAMP Moderate. |
| Overall rank | #68 | #30 |
| Review verdict | A favourite for people who outgrow simple triggers and want visual control. Simpler needs may be served by lighter tools, and code-first teams may prefer self-hosted options. | UiPath suits mid-market and enterprise organizations needing to orchestrate mission-critical workflows across legacy systems, documents, APIs, and AI agents under strict compliance. It is not suitable for individuals or early-stage startups seeking simple, lightweight no-code integrations. |
UiPath score factors
Make strengths
- Powerful visual logic
- Good operation economics
- Broad integrations
- Free plan
UiPath strengths
- Comprehensive coverage across agentic AI, API connectors, UI desktop automation, and document processing.
- Independently certified governance architecture meeting AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2 Type II, and FedRAMP Moderate standards.
- Flexible deployment models ranging from managed SaaS to air-gapped Kubernetes clusters.
- Built-in human-in-the-loop approval mechanisms for high-risk and edge-case exceptions.
Frequently asked
Make vs UiPath
Should I choose Make or UiPath?+
Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose UiPath when you need enterprises requiring industrial-scale automation across desktop interfaces, back-office documents, APIs, and audited AI agents. ToolsRank scores Make 78 and UiPath 80.4; the gap reflects editorial quality, utility, trust, and freshness, not popularity or payment.
Is Make cheaper than UiPath?+
Make: A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. UiPath: At the review date in September 2026, UiPath Automation Cloud offers a Basic plan starting at $25 per month for personal automation. Standard, Enterprise, and Test Cloud tiers require contacting sales. Features like unattended robots, BYOM, dedicated hosting, and advanced governance are tiered add-ons. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. Compare the plan you would actually use and verify current prices on each vendor's pricing page before purchasing.
Which is better for ai automation & workflows?+
UiPath currently scores higher for ai automation & workflows work. Make remains the stronger pick when your priority is operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Avoid UiPath if you are freelancers or small businesses looking for quick, lightweight web app triggers without enterprise governance or complex configuration.
Can I use Make and UiPath together?+
Yes. Make stands out for visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. UiPath stands out for uiPath uniquely combines deterministic, self-healing RPA with autonomous agentic workflows and intelligent document extraction, backed by external AI certifications including AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 42001, and FedRAMP Moderate. Pairing them makes sense when one workflow needs both strengths; otherwise pick the tool that matches your primary job.