Google Agentspace score factors
Editorial quality82
Practical utility86
Trust & transparency85
Freshness88
Engagement quality5
Momentum50
Decision guide · Reviewed Sep 23, 2026 · AI Knowledge Management, AI Enterprise Search
Google Agentspace
76.1
Onyx
76.7Choose Google Agentspace when you need enterprises needing unified, permission-aware AI search across Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Jira alongside no-code agent orchestration. Choose Onyx when you need engineering and operations teams requiring self-hostable, permission-aware enterprise search connected to multi-app ecosystems.
At a glance
The practical differences
| Decision factor | Google Agentspace | Onyx |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | enterprises needing unified, permission-aware AI search across Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Jira alongside no-code agent orchestration | engineering and operations teams requiring self-hostable, permission-aware enterprise search connected to multi-app ecosystems |
| Not ideal for | individual creators or small freelance operations needing only a standalone consumer chatbot without enterprise data connectors | teams seeking a lightweight document reader without technical infrastructure or integration configuration needs |
| Pricing | At the review date (September 2026), pricing starts at $21 per seat/month for the Business edition and $30 per seat/month for Standard/Plus editions. A usage-based Pay-as-you-go edition ($0 seat fee, minimum 20 seats) is rolling out. Frontline editions and custom enterprise tiers require contacting sales. Verify current rates on Google Cloud. | Pricing reflects published Business plan rates billed annually as of September 2026. Self-hosting via open source is available, and an Enterprise tier requires contacting sales. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. |
| Key difference | Unlike generic AI chat interfaces, it couples deep permission-aware connectors for both Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 environments with native Model Armor threat screening and no-code agent building. | Onyx combines open-source transparency and self-hosting flexibility with enterprise-grade permission inheritance across 40+ connectors, hybrid search, and knowledge graph RAG. |
| Overall rank | #209 | #183 |
| Review verdict | Google Agentspace suits mid-sized to enterprise organizations looking to connect scattered documentation across Google and Microsoft stacks while building custom workflow agents with IT guardrails. It is not intended for single-user freelancers or hobbyists who do not need enterprise connector management and governance infrastructure. | Onyx suits engineering-led workplaces and security-conscious enterprises seeking an auditable, self-hostable alternative to proprietary workplace search tools like Glean. It is less suited for small teams without dedicated technical support or organizations needing a turnkey, zero-configuration hosted tool out of the box. |
Onyx score factors
Editorial quality78
Practical utility84
Trust & transparency80
Freshness88
Engagement quality8
Momentum100
Google Agentspace strengths
- Native support for both Microsoft 365 (OneDrive, SharePoint) and Google Workspace data repositories
- Model Armor runtime protection included against prompt injection and sensitive data leaks
- Provides both no-code drag-and-drop agent building and ADK-based developer extensibility
- Customer data and prompts are not used to train Google models or sold to third parties
Onyx strengths
- Open-source codebase allows full auditing, self-hosting, and infrastructure transparency
- Inherits granular permissions and RBAC across more than 40 enterprise connectors
- Supports modern agent capabilities including MCP actions, code execution, and web search
Frequently asked
Google Agentspace vs Onyx
Should I choose Google Agentspace or Onyx?+
Choose Google Agentspace when you need enterprises needing unified, permission-aware AI search across Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Jira alongside no-code agent orchestration. Choose Onyx when you need engineering and operations teams requiring self-hostable, permission-aware enterprise search connected to multi-app ecosystems. ToolsRank scores Google Agentspace 76.1 and Onyx 76.7; the gap reflects editorial quality, utility, trust, and freshness, not popularity or payment.
Is Google Agentspace cheaper than Onyx?+
Google Agentspace: At the review date (September 2026), pricing starts at $21 per seat/month for the Business edition and $30 per seat/month for Standard/Plus editions. A usage-based Pay-as-you-go edition ($0 seat fee, minimum 20 seats) is rolling out. Frontline editions and custom enterprise tiers require contacting sales. Verify current rates on Google Cloud. Onyx: Pricing reflects published Business plan rates billed annually as of September 2026. Self-hosting via open source is available, and an Enterprise tier requires contacting sales. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. Compare the plan you would actually use and verify current prices on each vendor's pricing page before purchasing.
Which is better for ai knowledge management?+
Onyx currently scores higher for ai knowledge management work. Google Agentspace remains the stronger pick when your priority is enterprises needing unified, permission-aware AI search across Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Jira alongside no-code agent orchestration. Avoid Onyx if you are teams seeking a lightweight document reader without technical infrastructure or integration configuration needs.
Can I use Google Agentspace and Onyx together?+
Yes. Google Agentspace stands out for unlike generic AI chat interfaces, it couples deep permission-aware connectors for both Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 environments with native Model Armor threat screening and no-code agent building. Onyx stands out for onyx combines open-source transparency and self-hosting flexibility with enterprise-grade permission inheritance across 40+ connectors, hybrid search, and knowledge graph RAG. Pairing them makes sense when one workflow needs both strengths; otherwise pick the tool that matches your primary job.