Make score factors
Editorial quality82
Practical utility86
Trust & transparency82
Freshness84
Engagement quality3
Momentum100
Decision guide · Reviewed Sep 8, 2026 · AI Automation & Workflows, No-Code Automation Platforms
Make
78
Microsoft Power Automate
76.5Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose Microsoft Power Automate when you need organizations seeking combined cloud and legacy desktop RPA with tight Microsoft 365, Dataverse, and enterprise governance support..
At a glance
The practical differences
| Decision factor | Make | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps | organizations seeking combined cloud and legacy desktop RPA with tight Microsoft 365, Dataverse, and enterprise governance support. |
| Not ideal for | users who only need a few simple triggers or teams that require self-hosting | teams wanting a lightweight standalone webhook tool without Microsoft ecosystem dependencies or complex licensing structures. |
| Pricing | A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. | At the review date (September 2026), Microsoft offers a 30-day free trial, with paid plans starting at $15 per user/month paid yearly for Premium or $150 per bot/month paid yearly for unattended Process licensing. Enterprise pricing varies by region and currency, so check the official pricing page before purchasing. |
| Key difference | Visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. | Power Automate combines native Microsoft 365 and Dataverse integration with unified digital and robotic process automation (DPA and RPA), backed by process mining and Copilot-driven authoring. |
| Overall rank | #68 | #129 |
| Review verdict | A favourite for people who outgrow simple triggers and want visual control. Simpler needs may be served by lighter tools, and code-first teams may prefer self-hosted options. | Microsoft Power Automate suits mid-sized to enterprise organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem that require both API-level cloud workflows and legacy desktop RPA. It is less suitable for teams operating strictly outside Microsoft services or small groups needing lightweight, non-enterprise automation without tenant-level administration. |
Microsoft Power Automate score factors
Editorial quality82
Practical utility90
Trust & transparency85
Freshness86
Engagement quality0
Momentum50
Make strengths
- Powerful visual logic
- Good operation economics
- Broad integrations
- Free plan
Microsoft Power Automate strengths
- Native interoperability with Microsoft 365 apps, Dynamics 365, and Power Platform
- Extensive library of more than 1,400 certified API connectors alongside custom connector support
- Bridges modern API automation and legacy desktop systems via attended and unattended RPA
- Integrated process mining provides empirical data to identify workflow bottlenecks
Frequently asked
Make vs Microsoft Power Automate
Should I choose Make or Microsoft Power Automate?+
Choose Make when you need operations and marketing teams building complex, multi-branch automations with AI steps. Choose Microsoft Power Automate when you need organizations seeking combined cloud and legacy desktop RPA with tight Microsoft 365, Dataverse, and enterprise governance support.. ToolsRank scores Make 78 and Microsoft Power Automate 76.5; the gap reflects editorial quality, utility, trust, and freshness, not popularity or payment.
Is Make cheaper than Microsoft Power Automate?+
Make: A free plan includes a monthly operations allowance; Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans add operations, faster intervals, and controls at the review date. Verify current terms on the official pricing page. Microsoft Power Automate: At the review date (September 2026), Microsoft offers a 30-day free trial, with paid plans starting at $15 per user/month paid yearly for Premium or $150 per bot/month paid yearly for unattended Process licensing. Enterprise pricing varies by region and currency, so check the official pricing page before purchasing. Compare the plan you would actually use and verify current prices on each vendor's pricing page before purchasing.
Which is better for ai automation & workflows?+
Make currently scores higher for ai automation & workflows work. Microsoft Power Automate remains the stronger pick when your priority is organizations seeking combined cloud and legacy desktop RPA with tight Microsoft 365, Dataverse, and enterprise governance support.. Avoid Make if you are users who only need a few simple triggers or teams that require self-hosting.
Can I use Make and Microsoft Power Automate together?+
Yes. Make stands out for visual, branch-friendly scenario design with strong value per operation and growing AI agent features. Microsoft Power Automate stands out for power Automate combines native Microsoft 365 and Dataverse integration with unified digital and robotic process automation (DPA and RPA), backed by process mining and Copilot-driven authoring. Pairing them makes sense when one workflow needs both strengths; otherwise pick the tool that matches your primary job.